No-envy, efficiency, and collective rationality
نویسنده
چکیده
We consider the problem of a fair collective choice function (fair CCF) which maps each profile of extended preference orderings into the set of fair social states (the set consists of alternatives which are both Pareto efficient and envy-free) when such a set exists. Our main objective is to examine compatibility of fair social choices with collective rationality. We formulate desirable properties of collective rationality, and look for CCFs satisfying them. Next, we show that there is no CCF that satisfies most of the choice-consistency properties and a simple concept of fairness simultaneously. Moreover, we reveal that there exists no collective choice function that selects efficient and envy-free states cannot be rationalized by a social preference relation. ∗Department of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan, 1868601. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +81-42-580-8192; Fax: +81-42-580-8195. This paper is part of my Ph. D. Thesis. The author is deeply grateful to Kotaro Suzumura, Koichi Tadenuma, Shinji Yamashige, Kiwako Sakamoto, Peter Lambert, Ryoichi Nagahisa, Yukihiro Nishimura and Toyotaka Sakai, Marc Fleurbaey and two anonymous refrees for helpful comments and also thanks the 21st century Centers of Excellence (COE) project on “Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems” for financial support. Any remaining errors are my responsibility.
منابع مشابه
House allocation with fractional endowments
We study a generalization of the well known house allocation problem in which agents may own fractions of different houses summing to an arbitrary quantity, but have use for only the equivalent of one unit of a house. We also depart from the classical model by assuming that arbitrary quantities of each house may be available to the market. Justified envy considerations arise when two agents hav...
متن کاملTruth, Envy, and Truthful Market Clearing Bundle Pricing
We give a non-trivial class of valuation functions for which we give auctions that are efficient, truthful and envy-free. We give interesting classes of valuations for which one can design such auctions. Surprisingly, we also show that minor modifications to these valuations lead to impossibility results, the most surprising of which is that for a natural class of valuations, one cannot achieve...
متن کاملOn the Interplay between Incentive Compatibility and Envy Freeness
We study mechanisms for an allocation of goods among agents, where agents have no incentive to lie about their true values (incentive compatible) and for which no agent will seek to exchange outcomes with another (envy-free). Mechanisms satisfying each requirement separately have been studied extensively, but there are few results on mechanisms achieving both. We are interested in those allocat...
متن کاملDoes collective rationality entail efficiency?
Collective rationality in its ordinary sense is rationality’s extension to groups. It does not entail efficiency by definition. Showing that it entails efficiency requires a normative argument. Game theorists treating cooperative games generally assume that collective rationality entails efficiency, but formulating the reasoning that leads individuals to efficiency, and verifying the rationalit...
متن کاملCollective rationality in bargaining
Roth (1977) axiomatized the Nash (1950) bargaining solution without Pareto optimality. His result is considered an improvement on Nash’s original one, since it dispenses with notions of collective rationality. Several variants of Roth’s result have been obtained in a line of subsequent works. However, all of them rely on Nash’s (1950) independence axiom. Whether or how collective rationality ca...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Social Choice and Welfare
دوره 40 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013